|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 68-73
Sensitivity to common aeroallergens in asthma patients in Delhi-National Capital Region
Manoj Kumar1, Rajesh Kumar Gupta2, Sonam Spalgais3, Raj Kumar3
1 Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Vocational Studies and Applied Sciences, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
2 Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Vocational Studies and Applied Sciences, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||12-Dec-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||08-Jun-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||20-Nov-2020|
Dr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta
School of Vocational Studies and Applied Sciences, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida - 201 308, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
BACKGROUND: Skin prick test (SPT) is the “gold standard” in the assessment of sensitivity to inhalant allergens. SPT is performed with antigen extracts from India and evaluated according to the Standard Indian Guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine sensitivity by skin prick test in asthma patients in metropolitical city of Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of skin prick test with aeroallergens in asthma patients and their combination with clinical diagnosis. Two hundred asthma patients consisting of 81 (40.5%) males and 119 (59.5%) females with a mean age of 30.51 ± 9.85 years aged between 12 and 60 years were selected for study from Viswanathan Chest Hospital, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Delhi, between 2017 and 2018. Fifty-eight different common aeroallergen tests were tested through skin prick test (SPT) in patients of bronchial asthma. The sensitivity of all common aeroallergens was analyzed by MS Excel 2010.
RESULTS: A significant (2+ and above) skin-positive reaction against aeroallergens was found in 114 (57%) asthma patients. The younger adults aged 21-30 years were the foremost commonly affected group with 84 (43.5%). Among individual allergens, the most common aeroallergens showed a significant positive skin reaction, which were cockroaches 68 (34%) and moth 63 (32.5%), followed by mosquito 61 (30.5%), housefly 55 (27.5%), rice weevil 41 (20.5%), and house dust mite (HDM) 22 (11.0%).
CONCLUSION: In the present study, we found that insects (cockroaches, housefly, mosquito, and rice weevil) and HDM are the most common skin sensitive aeroallergens in Delhi-NCR. The sensitization was the most common in the younger age group patients.
Keywords: Allergy, asthma, common aeroallergens, SPT
|How to cite this article:|
Kumar M, Gupta RK, Spalgais S, Kumar R. Sensitivity to common aeroallergens in asthma patients in Delhi-National Capital Region. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020;34:68-73
|How to cite this URL:|
Kumar M, Gupta RK, Spalgais S, Kumar R. Sensitivity to common aeroallergens in asthma patients in Delhi-National Capital Region. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 1];34:68-73. Available from: https://www.ijaai.in/text.asp?2020/34/2/68/300917
| Introduction|| |
Aeroallergens play an important role in the assessment of respiratory allergic diseases. Pollens, house dust mites (HDMs), molds, insects, and pets are the most common allergens., The types of aeroallergens, however, differ widely depending on localities and even vary both within and between countries.
Asthma is a major cause of chronic morbidity and mortality throughout the world and is characterized by paroxysmal spasmodic narrowing of the bronchial airway due to inflammation of the bronchial tree and contraction of the bronchial smooth muscles. It is well known that asthma and rhinitis coexist in many patients. Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a recognized risk factor for asthma, with 20%–30% of such patients having asthma; conversely, 60%–78% of patients with asthma have coexisting AR., Common risk factors include indoor and outdoor exposures to allergens including HDMs, cockroaches, mosquitos, housefly, pollens, molds, animal dander, and birds' feather and droppings.
Skin prick testing (SPT) has been considered to be the “gold standard” in the assessment of inhalant allergen sensitivity, and results are interpreted in the context of clinical history and epidemiological profile. SPT reactivity prevalence in any community depends on age, sex, and geographical factors. This study was designed for the detection of the prevalence of skin reactivity to common aeroallergens in asthma patients in the metropolitical city of Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR).
| Materials and Methods|| |
It was a prospective observational study conducted at the Outpatient Department of Viswanathan Chest Hospital, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Delhi, in the years 2017–2018. We enrolled 200 asthmatic patients comprising 81 (43.5%) males and 119 (59.5%) females, with a mean age of 30.51 (12–60 years). The diagnosis of asthma was done as per the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines 2017. We selected asthma patients who had symptoms for a minimum of 1 or more years to establish the diagnosis and exclude other identifiable causes by virtue of their clinical history and physical examination. All patients were nonsmokers. There was no associated history of tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, endocrine disease, or coronary artery disease. Pregnant females were excluded from the study. Hemogram, sputum, and chest radiography were done to rule out other diagnoses. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee, and written consent of each patient was obtained for participation in the study. All the enrolled patients underwent SPT for 57 common aeroallergens.
Skin prick test
SPT was done with 57 different types of common aeroallergens, which included 5 types of grass pollens, 16 types of weed pollens, 11 types of tree pollens, 4 types of dust, 12 types of fungi, and 5 types of insects, HDM, kapok cotton, wool, and silk antigens. The allergen extracts (1:10 w/v, 50% glycerinated) were obtained from All Cure Pharma Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. Glycerinated buffered saline and histamine diphosphate in glycerinated buffer were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. In brief, the volar aspect of the forearm cleaned with cotton ball soaked in 70% alcohol was allowed to dry. A small drop of antigen was placed on the forearm, and each drop was numbered. Then, skin was pricked using 26.5G sterile needles. The skin test reactions were graded by calculating the mean diameter as (D + d)/2; D = largest diameter and d = orthogonal or perpendicular diameter at the largest width of D after 15–20 min in comparisons to the wheal size of positive control, i.e., histamine diphosphate (10 mg/ml). To ensure uniformity, the same lots of cockroach extracts were used in all patients, and only one researcher performed all SPT. A positive result (2+ and above) to a specific allergen is indicated by a mean wheal diameter measuring 3 mm or more, greater than the negative control (buffered saline) as per Standard Indian Guidelines.
| Results|| |
Out of the 200 enrolled patients, 81 (40.5%) were males and 119 (59.5%) females, with 80.5% of the study population from an urban area of the metropolitan city, i.e., Delhi-NCR. The age of patients ranged from 12 to 60 years, with a mean of 30.51 ± 9.85 years. The average body mass index of the patients was 25.74 ± 5.27 kg/m2, and overall skin prick sensitivity to aeroallergens (2+ and above) in asthma patients with at least one positive to aeroallergens was 114 (57%). The epidemiological data of asthma patients are shown in [Table 1].
The SPT positivity to common aeroallergens was highest in the 21–30 years' age group and least in >50 years [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Patients' age-wise distribution and skin prick testing sensitivity in aeroallergens|
Click here to view
Patients' clinical characteristics
The majority of enrolled patients, i.e., 129 (65.5%), were in the age group of ≥25 years, while the remaining 71 (35.5%) were ≤25 years. The duration of asthma patients <5 years was present in 136 (68%) and more than ≥5 years was in 64 (32%) cases. The family history of asthmatic was positive in 121 (60.5%) patients. Wheezing was the most common symptom (92.5%), followed by cough (91.5%), nasal congestion (88%), and skin complaints (22%) [Table 2].
In our study, insects (97; 49%) were found the most common aeroallergens, followed by weed pollens (14%), HDM (11%), fungi (10.5%), tree pollen (9.5%), dust (6%), kapok cotton (5.5%), grass pollen (3.5%), silk (1.5%), and wool (1%). Among insects, cockroach allergen (68; 34%) was found highest in SPT-positive patients [Table 3].
Detailed sensitivity of all antigens tested
Among individual allergens, the most common insect was cockroach (34%) and least common was rice weevil (20.5%). Among grass pollens, overall, 7 (3.5%) were positive, in which Cenchrus, Cynodon, and Pennisetum (2%) were the most common allergens, followed by Sorghum (0.5%). However, Imperata was negative in all enrolled patients [Table 4].
Among weed pollens, overall, 28 (14%) were positive, in which Cassia occidentalis (4%) was the most common allergen, followed by Ageratum (3%), Gynandropsis (2.5%), Adhatoda (2%), Artemisia (2%), Argemone (2%), Suaeda (2%), Amaranthus spinosus (1.5%), Xanthium (1.5%), Chenopodium album (1%), Brassica (1%), Dodonaea (1%), Cannabis (0.5%), Chenopodium Murale (0.5%). However, Parthenium and Asphodelus had shown no SPT reactivity in any patient [Table 4].
Among tree pollens, overall, 19 (9.5%) were positive, in which Ricinus (4%) was most common, followed by Cassia siamea (2.5%), Prosopis (2.5%), Holoptelea (2%), Salvadora (1.5%), Melia (1%), Putranjiva (1%), Kigelia (1%), and Morus (1%). However, Eucalyptus and Ehretia were found the least common allergen in the group [Table 4].
Among dusts, overall, 12 (6%) were positive, in which house dust (8.5%) was most common, followed by wheat dust (6%), cotton dust (2.5%), and paper dust (1.5%). HDM was significantly positive in 22 (11%), with the overall third offending allergen in the study population [Table 4].
Among the fungal spores, overall, 21 (10.5%) were positive, in which Aspergillus fumigatus (4.5%) was the most common, followed by Aspergillus tamarii (3%), Candida (2%), Epicoccum (2%), Trichoderma (2%), Rhizopus (2%), Alternaria (1.5%), and Helminthosporium (1%). Curvularia, Cladosporium, Phoma, and Mucor (0.5%) were found the least common aeroallergens [Table 4].
Among insects, overall, 97 (48.5%) were positive, in which cockroach (34%) was the most common allergen, followed by moth (32.5%), mosquito (30.5%), and housefly (27.5%). The least common allergen was rice weevil (20.5%). In other group, kapok cotton was significantly positive in 4.5%, followed by silk (1.5%) and wool (1%) [Table 4].
| Discussion|| |
Skin prick testing has been considered to be the “gold standard” in the assessment of inhalant allergen sensitivity. Results are interpreted as per the Indian Standard Guidelines  in the context of clinical history and epidemiological profile [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Our study showed that the sensitizing common aeroallergens in asthma patients were pollens (grasses, weeds, and trees), HDM, dusts, fungi, insects, kapok cotton, silk, and wool. It was observed that the most common aeroallergens, mainly insects including cockroach (34%) and moth (32.5%) allergens, showed a significant positive skin reaction, followed by mosquito (30.5%), housefly (27.5%), and rice weevil (20.5%).
In the present study, the highest number of asthmatic patients (84; 42%) were in the younger aged 21–30 years, and they were the most commonly affected group with 114 (57%) patients who found significant skin positive [Figure 1]. Similar studies by Kumar et al. reported that younger adults were the most commonly affected group with significant skin positive patients.,, Similar to our study, Ghaffari et al. showed that allergen SPT reactivity is low in the younger age group, increases in the middle age group, and then tends to decrease with advancing age. Wang et al. showed the prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens decreased with increasing age.
In our study, all the 114 (100%) patients were multi-allergen sensitive on SPT. The insect group was the most common offending aeroallergen seen in 48.5% of patents, followed by weed pollen (14%), HDM (11%), fungi (10.5%), tree pollen (9.5%), dust (6%), kapok cotton (4.5%), grass pollen (3.5%), silk (1.5%), and wool (1%). Among the patients sensitive to insect, the commonly offending antigen was cockroach seen (34%), followed by moth (32.5%), mosquito (30.5%), housefly (27.5%), and rice weevil (20.5%). Ghaffari et al. in 2010 revealed that the most common SPT reaction was with HDM, i.e., Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (25.3%) and Dermatophagoides farina (24.8%), followed by cockroach (15.7%) and feather (7.5%). Similar results were obtained by Knight-Madden et al. who showed that the most common significant SPT was due to D. pteronyssinus (33%) and D. farina (32%), followed by cockroach (23%). Almogren observed that the most frequently reacting indoor allergen was HDM (77.8%), followed by cat (33.6%) and cockroach (19.2%) allergens. Lopes et al. from Recife, Brazil, in a case–control study found that 27.6% were SPT positive for cockroach (Periplaneta americana) allergen. Wang et al. from China demonstrated that HDMs (84.4%) comprised the most common aeroallergen, then followed by pet allergens (23.4%), cockroaches (21.1%), molds, and pollen. Sattar et al. from Qatar found that cockroaches and dust mites were more common aeroallergens in asthmatic patients. Sam et al. from Malaysia also demonstrated that cockroach was the most common allergen in 200 asthmatics. The different studies from different parts of the world show different SPT patterns. Most of the studies showed that HDM and cockroach are the two main allergens. Our study also found cockroach as the most common allergen and HDM as the third most common allergen. This difference over the globe may be due to different genetic susceptibilites, geographic locations, cultures, and lifestyles of people.
An early study by Singhal et al. (2003) from the same institute showed that the most common allergen positive on SPT among all allergic disease was insects (17.29%), followed by various types of dust (4.39%), grass pollen (2.28%), weed pollens (2.18%), tree pollens (1.22%), fungal spores (1.22%), and kapok cotton (1.75%). Among insects, the most common offending allergen was housefly, followed by mosquito and moth. Again, the same author in (2012) from Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Delhi, showed that most common positive in SPT were insect (43.90%), weed (21.79%), tree (15.14%) pollens, dust (14.49%), HDM (12.42%), fungi (11.98%), grass pollens (7.73%), kapok cotton (2.18%), silk (1.30%), and wool (0.76%). Among the insects, the most common allergens were month and mosquito. The present study from the same institute found that insect was the most common allergen. Among the insects, the most common allergen was cockroach. The above finding showed a different pattern of allergen sensitivity in the same institute in the last two decades. These differences may be due to change in patient profile, as in the present study, we enrolled only asthmatic patients. While in early studies includes all respiratory allergic disease i.e. asthma, allergic rhinitis and both. These differences may due to change in climatically condition, fauna, and flora of Delhi-NCR in the last two decades.
In our study among insects, cockroach (34%) was the most common aeroallergen showing a significant positive skin reaction, followed by moth (32.5%), mosquito (30.5%), housefly (27.5%), and rice weevil (20.5%). Patel et al. from Gujarat have shown that moth was the most common insect allergen. Agrawal et al. from Uttar Pradesh demonstrated cockroach as the most common offending insect. Similarly, Giridhar et al. from Lucknow city also reported that cockroach was the most common allergen  and Rasool et al. studied on Kashmiri population, observed that pollens was the most common allergens, followed by HDM. Furthermore, Singhal et al. in 2003 revealed that cockroach, housefly, mosquito, moth, and rice weevil were also the most important insect allergens showing a significant positive skin reaction. It is seen that different studies from different regions/states of our country report different SPT patterns. This difference in allergen among respiratory allergic patients from different parts of the country may be due to different cultures, geographic, climatic conditions, fauna, and flora of particular area/region.
Our study will be useful in providing information on the pattern of allergen sensitization in Delhi-NCR of the country. The variability in skin prick test results for various aeroallergens in different regions of the country can be helpful for diagnosis and management of respiratory disease patients.
| Conclusion|| |
The SPT sensitivity among allergic patients was different even in the same institute over the last two decades, with cockroach as the most common insect allergen in the present study. These changes in SPT pattern may due to change in climatic conditions and fauna and flora with patients' characteristics over the last two decades.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Singh AB, Kumar P. Aeroallergens in clinical practice of allergy in India. An overview. Ann Agric Environ Med 2003;10:131-6.
Fereidouni M, Hossini RF, Azad FJ, Assarehzadegan MA, Varasteh A. Skin prick test reactivity to common aeroallergens among allergic rhinitis patients in Iran. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2009;37:73-9.
van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C, Passalacqua G, Bousquet J, Canonica GW, Durham SR, et al
. Consensus statement on the treatment of allergic rhinitis. European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 2000;55:116-34.
Smith JM. Epidemiology and natural history of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis (eczema). In: Middleton E Jr., Reed CE, Ellis EF, editors. Allergy: Principles and Practice. 2nd
ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1983. p. 771-803.
Grossman J. One air way, one disease. Chest 1997;111:11S-6.
Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA); 2017. Available from: http://www.ginasthma.org/
. [Last accessed on 2020 Mar 13].
Gaur SN, Kumar R, Singh AB, Agarwal MK, Arora N. Guidelines for practice of allergen immunotherapy in India: 2017 – An update. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2017; 31:3-33. [Full text]
Singhal P, Kumar R. A study of skin sensitivity to various allergens by intradermal test in patients with respiratory allergy (bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis) in India. Int Med J Thai 2003;19:202-7.
Kumar R, Sharan N, Kumar M, Bisht I, Gaur SN. Pattern of skin sensitivity to various aeroallergens in patients of bronchial asthma and/or allergic rhinitis in India. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2012;26:66-72. [Full text]
Kumar R, Kumar M, Bisht I, Singh K. Prevalence of aeroallergens in patients of bronchial asthma and/or allergic rhinitis in India based on skin prick test reactivity. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2017;31:45-55. [Full text]
Ghaffari J, Khademloo M, Saffar MJ, Rafiei A, Masiha F. Hypersensitivity to house dust mite and cockroach is the most common allergy in north of Iran. Iran J Immunol 2010;7:234-9.
Wang W, Huang X, Chen Z, Zheng R, Chen Y, Zhang G, et al
. Prevalence and trends of sensitisation to aeroallergens in patients with allergic rhinitis in Guangzhou, China: A 10-year retrospective study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011085.
Knight-Madden J, Forrester TE, Hambleton IR, Lewis N, Greenough A. Skin test reactivity to aeroallergens in Jamaicans: Relationship to asthma. West Indian Med J 2006;55:142-7.
Almogren A. Airway allergy and skin reactivity to aeroallergens in Riyadh. Saudi Med J 2009;30:392-6.
Lopes MI, Miranda PJ, Sarinho E. Use of the skin prick test and specific immunoglobulin E for the diagnosis of cockroach allergy. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2006;82:204-9.
Sattar HA, Mobayed H, Al-Mohammed AA, Ibrahim AS, Jufairi AA, Balamurugan P, et al
. The pattern of indoor and outdoor respiratory allergens in asthmatic adult patients in a humid and desert newly developed country. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;35:300-5.
Sam CK, Soon SC, Liam CK, Padmaja K, Cheng HM. An investigation of aeroallergens affecting urban Malaysian asthmatics. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 1998;16:17-20.
Patel A, Choudhary S. Prevalence of allergen sensitivity in nasobronchial allergy in Gujarat, India. Natl J Med Res 2012;2:431-4.
Agrawal RL, Chandra A, Jain S, Agrawal G, Snehlata. Identification of common allergens by skin prick test associated with united airway disease in Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008;22:7-13.
Giridhar BH, Kumar S, Verma AK, Singh A, Kumar D, Prasad R, et al
. A study on profile of allergens sensitivity and associated factors in naso-bronchial allergic patients. Nat J Med Res 2012;2:70-6.
Rasool R, Shera IA, Nissar S, Shah ZA, Nayak N, Siddiqi MA, et al
. Role of skin prick test in allergic disorders: A prospective study in kashmiri population in light of review. Indian J Dermatol 2013;58:12-7.
] [Full text]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]