Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 142
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
EDITORIAL
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 41-42

Allergen immunotherapy: What does the future hold?


Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda Hospital, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication12-Oct-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr Shailendra Nath Gaur
Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda Hospital, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijaai.ijaai_23_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Gaur SN. Allergen immunotherapy: What does the future hold?. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018;32:41-2

How to cite this URL:
Gaur SN. Allergen immunotherapy: What does the future hold?. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 13];32:41-2. Available from: http://www.ijaai.in/text.asp?2018/32/2/41/243228

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), the only known causal therapy for allergies is globally being used in the following formulations – subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and allergoids. In India, AIT has been used for approximately 50 years, with aqueous extract based SCIT being the conventionally accepted treatment modality. Limitations of the current formulations of the native extracts utilized for SCIT and SLIT have led to increased research on innovative formulations for AIT. In the recent years, a lot of research is being conducted and primarily focuses on reducing the number of AIT doses to achieve efficacy, improving safety and compliance, and utilizing AIT for newer indications. We need to keep abreast with the latest developments in the field of AIT and would look forward to these advancements being available and improve patient care and outcomes.

The future of AIT being discussed in an article of this issue “Future modalities in allergen immunotherapy: A brief overview” notes that the approaches are divided into the following sections:

  1. New routes of AIT
  2. New formulations of AIT and
  3. New combination with AIT.


Among the new routes are included as follows: oral immunotherapy (OIT), epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT), and intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT). In OIT, the allergenic food in mixed in a vehicle and taken orally in increased concentrations.[1] Food allergens such as milk, egg, and peanut have been evaluated in the ongoing clinical trials. Administration of allergens in the epicutaneous tissue is known as EPIT and is associated with improved safety, as there are reduced chances of the allergen reaching the vasculature.[2] Efficacy for aeroallergens (Grass pollen) and a trend toward improvement for cow's milk food allergy has been observed in EPIT. In ILIT, the allergens are injected into the inguinal lymph nodes and has been evaluated for aeroallergens (birch, grass, dust mites, cat, and dog allergy), bee venom, and food allergen (ovalbumin).[2],[3],[4] The main advantage of ILIT is the reduced number of doses to obtain clinical efficacy.

Newer formulations in AIT include – allergoids, peptides, and recombinant allergens. Allergoids have the property of,[5] improved safety due to the reduction of B-cell epitopes (thereby, reduced immunoglobulin E [IgE] binding) and retained efficacy as the T-cell epitopes are retained. Thus, the advantages of allergoids include improved safety profile and furthermore, being depot preparations, they are associated with a convenient dosing schedule. Allergoids (studied for house dust mite and pollen allergens) are being used in clinical practice and contribute to approximately 50% of the total SCIT preparations in the European countries.[6] Peptide immunotherapy is the administration of short peptides which can actively interact with the T-cell epitopes and was recently unsuccessfully studied for cat allergy.[7] Recombinant major allergens from birch and grass pollen have been successfully evaluated for AIT.[8] However, the development of recombinant allergens is currently being kept on hold as they did not prove to be clinically significant as compared to extract-based immunotherapy. Furthermore, regulatory and quality requirements are additional considerations.

Finally, the addition of omalizumab (anti-IgE) to AIT although not an approved indication has been utilized to reduce the adverse events of AIT, especially in cases of venom and food immunotherapy. Furthermore, omalizumab has also been utilized to control the disease before initiation of AIT.[9]

The future holds promising therapies being evaluated for AIT in clinical studies. Currently, only the allergoids are being utilized in clinical practice. The status of other approaches would be understood in the coming years. Research on further modalities and availability of new modalities in clinical practice may improve patient outcomes.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Burbank AJ, Sood P, Vickery BP, Wood RA. Oral immunotherapy for food allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2016;36:55-69.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Senti G, Kündig TM. Novel delivery routes for allergy immunotherapy: Intralymphatic, epicutaneous, and intradermal. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2016;36:25-37.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kim ST, Park SH, Lee SM, Lee SP. Allergen-specific intralymphatic immunotherapy in human and animal studies. Asia Pac Allergy 2017;7:131-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Creticos PS. Allergen immunotherapy: Vaccine modification. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2016;36:103-24.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pfaar O, Bachert C, Bufe A, Buhl R, Ebner C, Eng P, et al. Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto- Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Pneumology (GPP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the German Association of ENT Surgeons (BV-HNO), the Professional Federation of Paediatricians and Youth Doctors (BVKJ), the Federal Association of Pulmonologists (BDP) and the German Dermatologists Association (BVDD). Allergo J Int 2014;23:282-319.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Calderón MA, Vidal C, Rodríguez Del Río P, Just J, Pfaar O, Tabar AI, et al. European survey on adverse systemic reactions in allergen immunotherapy (EASSI): A real-life clinical assessment. Allergy 2017;72:462-72.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Circassia. Circassia Announces Top-Line Results from Cat Allergy Phase III Study. . [Last accessed on 2018 July 16].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hoffmann HJ, Valovirta E, Pfaar O, Moingeon P, Schmid JM, Skaarup SH, et al. Novel approaches and perspectives in allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2017;72:1022-34.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dantzer JA, Wood RA. The use of omalizumab in allergen immunotherapy. Clin Exp Allergy 2018;48:232-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed187    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded26    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal